Search This Blog

Aspergers: Treatment and Intervention

Aspergers (AS) is a developmental disorder characterized by difficulties in social interaction, and restricted and unusual patterns of interest and behavior. This post is an attempt to summarize a series of concrete proposals for treatment and intervention, with a view to provide moms and dads and care providers with specific suggestions that may be helpful in devising educational and treatment programs for kids and adolescents affected by this form of social learning disability.

Every treatment and intervention program starts with a thorough assessment of the youngster’s deficit and assets in the context of a trans-disciplinary evaluation including assessments of behavioral (or psychiatric) history and current presentation, neuropsychological functioning, communication patterns (particularly the use of language for the purpose of social interaction, or Pragmatics), and adaptive functioning (the person’s ability to translate potential into competence in meeting the demands of everyday life).

The final formulation should include a characterization of the youngster’s deficits and abilities in these various areas. The actual diagnostic assignment should be the final step in the evaluation. Labels are necessary in order to secure services and guarantee a level of sophistication in addressing the youngster’s needs. The assignment of a label, however, should be done in a thoughtful way, so as to minimize stigmatization and avoid unwarranted assumptions. Every youngster is different. If one were to observe a group of people with Aspergers, one would probably be more impressed by how they differ than by how they are alike.

Therefore, it is absolutely crucial that intervention programs derived from comprehensive evaluations are individualized to insure that they address the unique profile of needs and strengths exhibited by the given youngster. The psychiatric label should never be assumed to convey a precise preconceived set of behaviors and needs. Its main function is to convey an overall sense of the pattern of difficulties present. Professionals should never start a discussion of the youngster’s needs by evoking the label. Rather, they should provide a detailed description of evaluation findings that resulted in the diagnosis of Aspergers. A discussion of any inconsistency with the diagnosis, as well as of the clinician’s level of confidence is assigning that diagnosis should also be provided.

The following set of guidelines reflects our clinical and research experience with Aspergers in the past few years. It should not be applied in specific cases without a thoughtful discussion of the individual youngster’s profile. The specific guidelines should be seen as a series of suggestions to be considered when planning for the person’s educational, treatment, and vocational program.

In sum: Do not take the diagnosis of Aspergers for granted – ask for details and for the individualized profile of your youngster; do not accept a discussion of your youngster’s profile that does not include strengths that may be utilized in the intervention program; and do not accept an intervention program that is based solely on the diagnosis – ask for the development of an appropriate program on the basis of your youngster’s profile, his/her educational setting or living conditions, and realistic short-term and long-term goals.

Some Guidelines for Treatment and Intervention—

The authorities that decide on entitlement to services are usually unaware of the extent and significance of the disabilities in Aspergers. Proficient verbal skills, overall IQ usually within the normal or above normal range, and a solitary life style often mask outstanding deficiencies observed primarily in novel or otherwise socially demanding situations, thus decreasing the perception of the very salient needs for supportive intervention. Thus, active participation on the part of the clinician, together with moms and dads and possibly an advocate, to forcefully pursue the patient’s eligibility for services is needed. It appears that, in the past; many people with ASPERGERS were diagnosed as learning disabled with eccentric features, a non-psychiatric diagnostic label that is much less effective in securing services. Others, who were given the diagnosis of autism or PDD-NOS, had often to contend with educational programs designed for much lower functioning kids, thus failing to have their relative strengths and unique disabilities properly addressed.

Yet another group of people with ASPERGERS are sometimes characterized as exhibiting “Social-Emotional Maladjustment” (SEM), an educational label that is often associated with conduct problems and willful maladaptive behaviors. These people are often placed in educational settings for people with conduct disorders, thus allowing for possibly the worst mismatch possible, namely of people with a very naïve understanding of social situations in a mix with those who can and do manipulate social situations to their advantage without the benefit of self-restraint.

It is very important, therefore, to stress that although people with ASPERGERS often present with maladaptive and disruptive behaviors in social settings, these are often a result of their narrow and overly concrete understanding of social phenomena, and the resultant overwhelming puzzlement they experience when required to meet the demands of interpersonal life. Therefore, the social problems exhibited by people with ASPERGERS should be addressed in the context of a thoughtful and comprehensive intervention needed to address their social disability – as a curriculum need, rather than punishable, willful behaviors deserving suspensions or other reprimands that in fact mean very little to them, and only exacerbate their already poor self-esteem.

Situations that maximize the significance of the disability include unstructured social situations (particularly with same age peers), and novel situations requiring intuitive or quick-adjusting social problem-solving skills. Therefore, it is important that any evaluation intended to ascertain the need for special services include detail interviews with moms and dads and professionals knowledgeable of the youngster in naturalistic settings (such as home and school), and, if possible; direct observations of the youngster in unstructured periods such as recess or otherwise unsupervised settings.

General intervention setting—

The applicable educational ideologies as well as quality of available services vary enormously from school district to school district, across the Country as well as within the various states and sometimes across time for the same school district. It is very important that moms and dads become well acquainted with the following factors involved in securing appropriate placement and programming for their youngster.

1. Knowledge of model programs: moms and dads should make an effort to locate programs (public or private) that are thought to provide high quality services according to local experts, parent support organizations, or other parents. Regardless of whether or not they would like for their youngster to be placed in that program, a visit to it may provide moms and dads with a model and criteria with which to judge the appropriateness of the local program offered to them.

2. Knowledge of the PPT (Planning and Placement Team) process: it is crucial that moms and dads become acquainted with the PPT process so as to become effective advocates for their kids. They should be counseled by clinicians, parent advocates, or legal aides as to their rights as moms and dads of kids with disabilities, and as to the alternatives available to them. Parents should attempt to avoid a confrontational or adversarial approach in the same way that they should avoid complacency and passivity. Moms and dads should know that the legal mandate is provision of “appropriate services” to their kids. Note that this does not mean the best, nor the most expensive. If parents or their representatives approach the PPT process demanding the latter, they may be seen as preempting both the due examination of the youngster’s needs by the school district authorities, as well as the actual decision.

Experience has shown that the most efficacious approach is to secure independent evaluations (to which you should be entitled) of both the youngster’s needs and any programs offered by the school district, and to present the case for appropriate programming based on evaluation findings and recommendations. In a great number of cases, the final decision is beneficial, as most educational providers are eager to serve their clients to the best of their abilities. In fact, across the country, a number of service providers are making a special attempt to better acquaint themselves with the special needs of kids with social learning disabilities, to train themselves and their staff, and to creatively establish better individualized programs. Nevertheless, if moms and dads are met with unreasonable uncooperativeness, they should seek the advice of other parents or of parent advocates, and even, if necessary; resort to the services of lawyers experienced in the area of disabilities.

3. The range of services available in their school district: moms and dads should make an attempt to visit the various suggested educational placements and service providers available in their school districts so as to obtain first-hand knowledge and feelings about them, including the physical setting, staffing, adult/student ratio, range of special/support services, and so forth.

The following are positive program specifications to be kept in mind when deciding on appropriate placements and programs for people with ASPERGERS. They may not be applicable to every person with ASPERGERS, nor are they feasible in some parts of the country. Nevertheless, they may be seen as optimal conditions to keep in mind when dealing with program specifications:

1. A concern for the acquisition of real-life skills in addition to the academic goals, making use of creative initiatives and making full use of the person’s interests and talents. For example, given the fact that people with ASPERGERS often excel in certain activities, social situations may be constructed so as to allow him or her the opportunity to take the leadership in the activity, explaining, demonstrating, or teaching others how to improve in the particular activity.

Such situations are ideal to help the person with ASPERGERS (a) take the perspective of others; (b) follow conversation and social interaction rules, and (c) follow coherent and less one-sided goal-directed behaviors and approaches. Additionally, by taking the leadership in an activity, the person’s self-esteem is likely to be enhanced, and his/her *usually disadvantageous) position vis-à-vis peers is for once reversed.

2. A willingness to adapt the curriculum content and requirements in order to flexibly provide opportunities for success, to foster the acquisition of a more positive self-concept, and to foster an internalized investment in performance and progress. This may mean that the person with ASPERGERS is provided with individual challenges in his/her areas of strengths, and with individualized programs in his/her areas of weakness.

3. Opportunities for social interaction and facilitation of social relationships in fairly structured and supervised activities.

4. Relatively small setting with ample opportunity for individual attention, individualized approach, and small work group.

5. The availability of a communication specialist with a special interest in pragmatics and social skills training, who can be available for individual and small group work, and who can also make a communication and social skills training intervention an integral part of all activities, implemented at all times, consistently, and across staff members, settings, and situations. This professional should also act as a resource to the other staff members.

6. The availability of a sensitive counselor who can focus on the person’s emotional well being, and who could serve as a coordinator of services, monitoring progress, serving as a resource to other staff members, and providing effective and supportive liaison with the family.

General Intervention Strategies—

Specific interventions, e.g. teaching practices and approaches, behavioral management techniques, strategies for emotional support, and activities intended to foster social and communication competence, should be conceived and implemented in a thoughtful, consistent (across setting, staff members, and situations), and individualized manner. More importantly, the benefit (or lack thereof) of specific recommendations should be assessed in an empirical fashion (i.e., based on an evaluation of events observed, documented or charted), with useful strategies being maintained and unhelpful ones discarded so as to promote a constant adjustment of the program to the specific conditions of the individual youngster with ASPERGERS.

The following items can be seen as tentative suggestion to be considered when discussing optimal approaches to be adopted. It should be noted, however; that there are degrees of concreteness and rigidity, paucity of insight, social awkwardness, communicative one-sidedness, and so forth, characterizing people with ASPERGERS. Care providers should embrace the wide range of expression and complexity of the disorder, avoiding dogmatism in favor of practical, individualized, and common-sensual clinical judgment. The following suggestions should be seen in this context:

1. Adaptive skills intended to increase the person’s self-sufficiency should be taught explicitly with no assumption that general explanations might suffice nor that he/she will be able to generalize from one concrete situation to similar ones. Frequently occurring problematic situations should be addressed by teaching the person verbally the exact sequence of appropriate actions that will result in an effective behavior. Rule sequences for e.g., shopping, using transportation, etc., should be taught verbally and repeatedly rehearsed with the help of the interventionist and other people involved in the person’s care.

There should be constant coordination and communication between all those involved so that these routines are reinforced in the same way and with little variation between the various people. Verbal instructions, rote planning and consistency are essential. A list of specific behaviors to be taught may be derived from results obtained with the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Expanded Edition, which assess adaptive behavior skills in the areas of Communication, Daily Living (self-help) Skills, Socialization, and Motor Skills.

2. Additional teaching guidelines should be derived from the person’s neuro-psychological profile of assets and deficits; specific intervention techniques should be similar to those usually employed for many subtypes of learning disabilities, with an effort to circumvent the identified difficulties by means of compensatory strategies, usually of a verbal nature.

For example, if significant motor, sensory-integration or visual-motor deficits are corroborated during the evaluation, the person with ASPERGERS should receive physical and occupational therapies. These latter should not only focus on traditional techniques designed to remediate motor deficits, sensory integration or visual-motor deficits, but should also reflect an effort to integrate these activities with learning of visual-spatial concepts, visual-spatial orientation and causation, time concepts, and body awareness, making use of narratives and verbal self-guidance.

3. Generalization of learned strategies and social concepts should be instructed, from the therapeutic setting to everyday life (e.g., to examine some aspects of a person’s physical characteristics as well as to retain full names in order to enhance knowledge of that person and facilitate interaction in the future).

4. Self-evaluation should be encouraged. Awareness should be gained into which situations are easily managed and which are potentially troublesome. This is especially important with respect to perceiving the need to use pre-learned strategies in appropriate situations. Self-evaluation should also be used to strengthen self-esteem and maximize situations in which success can be achieved. People with ASPERGERS often have many cognitive strengths and interests that can be used to the person’s advantage in specific situations as well as in planning for the future.

5. Skills, concepts, appropriate procedures should be taught in an explicit and rote fashion using a parts-to-whole verbal teaching approach, where the verbal steps are in the correct sequence for the behavior to be effective.

6. Social awareness should be cultivated, focusing on the relevant aspects of given situations, and pointing out the irrelevancies contained therein. Discrepancies between the person’s perceptions regarding the situation in question and the perceptions of other should be made explicit.

7. Specific problem-solving strategies should be taught for handling the requirements of frequently occurring troublesome situations. Training should also be necessary for recognizing situations as troublesome and applying learned strategies in discrepant situations.

8. The ability to interpret visual information simultaneously with auditory information should be strengthened, since it is important not only to be able to interpret other people’s nonverbal behavior correctly but also to interpret what is being said in conjunction with these nonverbal cues.

9. The person with ASPERGERS should be instructed on how to identify a novel situation and to resort to a pre-planned, well rehearsed list of steps to be taken. This list should involve a description of the situation, retrieval of pertinent knowledge and step-by-step decision-making. When the situation permits (another item to be explicitly defined), one of these steps might be reliance on a friend’s or adult’s advice, including a telephone consultation.

10. The link between specific frustrating or anxiety-provoking experiences and negative feelings should be taught to the person with ASPERGERS in a concrete, cause-effect fashion, so that he/she is able to gradually gain some measure of insight into his/her feelings. Also, the awareness of the impact of his/her actions on other people’s feelings should be fostered in the same fashion.

11. To enhance the person’s ability to compensate for typical difficulties processing visual sequences, particularly when these involve social themes, by making use of equally typical verbal strengths.

General Strategies for Communication Intervention and Social Skills Training—

For most people with ASPERGERS, the most important item of the educational curriculum and treatment strategy involves the need to enhance communication and social competence. This emphasis does not reflect a societal pressure for conformity or an attempt to stifle individuality and uniqueness. Rather, this emphasis reflects the clinical fact that most people with ASPERGERS are not loners by choice, and that there is a tendency, as kids develop towards adolescence, for despondency, negativism, and sometimes, clinical depression, as a result of the person’s increasing awareness of personal inadequacy in social situations, and repeated experiences of failure to make and/or maintain relationships.

The typical limitations of insight and self-reflection vis-a`-vis others often preclude spontaneous self-adjustment to social and interpersonal demands. The practice of communication and social skills do not imply the eventual acquisition of communicative or social spontaneity and naturalness. It does, however, better prepare the person with ASPERGERS to cope with social and interpersonal expectations, thus enhancing their attractiveness as conversational partners or as potential friends or companions. The following are suggestions intended to foster relevant skills in this important area:

1. The person with ASPERGERS should be taught to monitor his/her own speech style in terms of volume, rhythm, naturalness, adjusting depending on proximity to the speaker, context and social situation, and number of people and background noise.

2. The person with ASPERGERS should be helped to recognize and use a range of different means to interact, mediate, negotiate, persuade, discuss, and disagree through verbal means. In terms of formal properties of language, the person may benefit from help in thinking about idiomatic language that can only be understood in its own right, and practice in identifying them in both text and conversation. It is important to help the person to develop the ability to make inferences, to predict, to explain motivation, and to anticipate multiple outcomes so as to increase the flexibility with which the person both thinks about and uses language with other people.

3. The effort to develop the person’s skills with peers in terms of managing social situations should be a priority. This should include topic management, the ability to expand and elaborate on a range of different topics initiated by others, shifting topics, ending topics appropriately and feeling comfortable with a range of topics that are typically discussed by same-age peers.

4. Explicit verbal instructions on how to interpret other people’s social behavior should be taught and exercised in a rote fashion. The meaning of eye contact, gaze, various inflections as well as tone of voice, facial and hand gestures, non-literal communications such as humor, figurative language, irony, sarcasm and metaphor, should all be taught in a fashion not unlike the teaching of a foreign language, i.e., all elements should be made verbally explicit and appropriately and repeatedly drilled. The same principles should guide the training of the person’s expressive skills. Concrete situations should be exercised in the therapeutic setting and gradually tried out in naturally occurring situations. All those in close contact with the people with ASPERGERS should be made aware of the program so that consistency, monitoring and contingent reinforcement are maximized.

Of particular importance, encounters with unfamiliar people (e.g., making acquaintances) should be rehearsed until the person is made aware of the impact of his/her behavior on other people’s reactions to him/her. Techniques such as practicing in front of a mirror, listening to the recorded speech, watching a video recorded behavior, and so forth, should all be incorporated in this program. Social situations contrived in the therapeutic setting that usually require reliance on visual-receptive and other nonverbal skills for interpretation should be used and strategies for deciphering the most salient nonverbal dimensions inherent in these situations should be offered.

General Guidelines for Behavior Management—

People with ASPERGERS often exhibit different forms of challenging behavior. It is crucial that these behaviors are not seen as willful or malicious; rather, they should be viewed as connected to the person’s disability and treated as such by means of thoughtful, therapeutic, and educational strategies, rather than by simplistic and inconsistent punishment or other disciplinary measures that imply the assumption of deliberate misconduct. Specific problem-solving strategies, usually following a verbal rule, may be taught for handling the requirements of frequently occurring, troublesome situations (e.g., involving novelty, intense social demands, or frustration). Training is usually necessary for recognizing situations as troublesome and for selecting the best available learned strategy to use in such situations. The following are some suggestions on how to approach behavioral management in the case of people with ASPERGERS:

1. Helping the person with ASPERGERS make choices: There should not be an assumption that the person with ASPERGERS makes informed decisions based on his/her own set of elaborate likes and dislikes. Rather he/she should be helped to consider alternatives of action or choices, as well as their consequences (e.g., rewards and displeasure) and associated feelings. The need for such an artificial set of guidelines is a result of the person’s typical poor intuition and knowledge of self.

2. Setting limits: a list of frequent problematic behaviors such a preservations, obsessions, interrupting, or any other disruptive behaviors should be made and specific guidelines devised to deal with them whenever the behaviors arise. It is often helpful that these guidelines are discussed with the person with ASPERGERS in an explicit, rule-governed fashion, so that clear expectations are set and consistency across adults, settings and situations is maintained.

These explicit rules should be not unlike curriculum guidelines. The explicit approach should be devised based on the staff’s ongoing experiences, determined empirically, and discussed in team meetings. An effort should be made to establish as much as possible all possible (though few) contingencies and guidelines for limit setting so that each staff member does not need to improvise and thus possibly trigger the person’s oppositionality or a temper tantrum. When listing the problematic behaviors, it is important that these are specified in a hierarchy of priorities, so that staff and the person himself/herself concentrate on a small number of truly disruptive behaviors (to others or to self).

Academic Curriculum—

The curriculum content should be decided based on long-term goals, so that the utility of each item is evaluated in terms of its long-term benefits for the person’s socialization skills, vocational potential, and quality of life. Emphasis should be placed on skills that correspond to relative strengths for the person as well as skills that may be viewed as central for the person’s future vocational life (e.g., writing skills, computer skills, science). If the person has an area of special interest that is not as circumscribed and unusual so as to prevent utilization in prospective employment, such an interest or talent should be cultivated in a systematic fashion, helping the person learn strategies of learning (e.g., library, computerized data bases, Internet, etc.).

Specific projects can be set as part of the person’s credit-gathering, and specific mentorships (topic-related) can be established with staff members or people in the community. It is often useful to emphasize the utilization of computer resources, with a view to (a) compensate for typical difficulties in grapho-motor skills, (b) to foster motivation in self-taught strategies of learning, including the use of “on-line” resources, and (c) to establish contact via electronic mail with other people who share some interests, a more non-threatening form of social contact that may evolve into relationships, including personal contact.

Vocational Training—

Often, adults with ASPERGERS may fail to meet entry requirements (e.g., a college-degree) for jobs in their area of training, or fail to attain a job because of their poor interview skills, social disabilities, eccentricities, or anxiety attacks. Having failed to secure skilled employment (commensurate with their level of instruction and training), sometimes these people may be helped by well-meaning friends or relatives to find a manual job. As a result of their typically very poor visual-motor skills they may once again fail, leading to devastating emotional implications. It is important, therefore; that people with ASPERGERS are trained for and placed in jobs for which they are not neuro-psychologically impaired, and in which they will enjoy a certain degree of support and shelter.

It is also preferable that the job does not involve intensive social demands. As originally emphasized by Hans Asperger, there is a need to foster the development of existent talents and special interests in a way as to transform them into marketable skills. However, this is only part of the task to secure (and maintain) a work placement. Equal attention should be paid to the social demands defined by the nature of the jobs, including what to do during meal breaks, contact with the public or co-workers, or any other unstructured activity requiring social adjustment or improvisation.

Self-Support—

As people with ASPERGERS are usually self-described loners despite an often intense wish to make friends and have a more active social life, there is a need to facilitate social contact within the context of an activity-oriented group (e.g., church communities, hobby clubs, and self-support groups). The little experience available with the latter suggests that people with ASPERGERS enjoy the opportunity to meet others with similar problems and may develop relationships around an activity or subject of share interest.

Pharmacotherapy—

Although little information about pharmacological interventions with people with ASPERGERS is available, a conservative approach based on the evidence from autism should probably be adopted. In general, pharmacological interventions with young kids are probably best avoided. Specific medication might be indicated if ASPERGERS is accompanied by debilitating depressive symptoms, severe obsessions and compulsions, or a thought disorder. It is important for moms and dads to know that medications are prescribed for the treatment of specific symptoms, and not to treat the disorder as a whole.

Psychotherapy—

Although insight-oriented psychotherapy has not been shown to be very helpful, it does appear that fairly focused and structured counseling can be very useful for people with ASPERGERS, particularly in the context of overwhelming experiences of sadness or negativism, anxiety, family functioning, frustration in regard to vocational goals and placement, and ongoing social adjustment.

Aspergers CAST Test

The Aspergers CAST Test for kids is a test that will enable moms and dads to have a better sense of what the criteria for Aspergers looks like. For some of you, it will settle your nerves, for others, you will now have a better sense of what's going on with your youngster, enabling you to make appropriate choices with a better idea of where her/his challenges lay.

Read the following questions carefully, and choose the appropriate answer:

1. Does he/she join in playing games with others easily?
Y
N

2. Does he/she come up to you spontaneously for a chat?
Y
N

3. Was he/she speaking by 2 years old?
Y
N

4. Does he/she enjoy sports?
Y
N

5. Is it important for him/her to fit in with a peer group?
Y
N

6. Does he/she appear to notice unusual details that others miss?
Y
N

7. Does he/she tend to take things literally?
Y
N

8. When he/she was 3 years old, did he/she spend a lot of time pretending (e.g., play-acting being a super-hero, or holding teddy's tea parties?
Y
N

9. Does he/she like to do the same things over and over again, in the same way all the time?
Y
N

10. Does he/she find it easy to interact with other children?
Y
N

11. Can he/she keep a two-way conversation going?
Y
N

12. Can he/she read appropriately for his/her age?
Y
N

13. Does he/she mostly have the same interests as his/her peers?
Y
N

14. Does he/she have an interest that which takes up so much time that he/she does little else?
Y
N

15. Does he/she have friends, rather than just acquaintances?
Y
N

16. Does he/she often bring things to show you that interest him/her?
Y
N

17. Does he/she enjoy joking around?
Y
N

18. Does he/she have difficulty understanding the rules for polite behavior?
Y
N

19. Does he/she have an unusual memory for details?
Y
N

20. Is his/her voice unusual (e.g., overly adult, flat, or very monotonous?
Y
N

21. Are people important to him/her?
Y
N

22. Can he/she dress him/herself?
Y
N

23. Is he/she good at turn-taking in conversation?
Y
N

24. Does he/she play imaginatively with other children, and engage in role-play?
Y
N

25. Does he/she do or say things that are tactless or socially inappropriate?
Y
N

26. Can he/she count to 50 without leaving out any numbers?
Y
N

27. Does he/she make normal eye-contact?
Y
N

28. Does he/she have any unusual and repetitive movements?
Y
N

29. Is his/her social behavior very one-sided and always on his or her terms?
Y
N

30. Does your child sometimes say "you" or "he/she" when he/she means to say "I"?
Y
N

31. Does he/she prefer imaginative activities such as play-acting or story-telling, rather than numbers or a list of facts?
Y
N

32. Does he/she sometimes lose the listener because of not explaining what he/she is talking about?
Y
N

33. Can he/she ride a bicycle (even if with stabilizers)?
Y
N

34. Does he/she try to impose routines on himself/herself, or on others, in such a way that it causes problems?
Y
N

35. Does he/she care about how he/she is perceived by the rest of the group?
Y
N

36. Does he/she often turn conversations to his/her favorite subject rather than following what the other person wants to talk about?
Y
N

37. Does he/she have odd or unusual phrases?
Y
N

38. Have teachers ever expressed any concerns about his/her development?
Y
N
If Y, please specify___________________________________

39. Has he/she ever been diagnosed with the following?

• Language delay
Y
N

• Hyperactivity/Attention Deficit Disorder (ADHD)
Y
N

• Hearing or visual difficulties?
Y
N

• Autism Spectrum Condition, including Aspergers?
Y
N

• A physical disability?
Y
N

• Other? (please specify
Y
N
If Y, please specify___________________________________

The Aspergers Comprehensive Handbook

What would be a good punishment for an Aspergers child who ignores the house rules?

 RE: "What would be a good punishment for an Aspergers child who ignores the house rules?"

First of all, let’s think in terms of discipline rather than punishment. Punishment is mostly about parents getting revenge. Discipline, on the other hand, is mostly about mentoring and providing direction.

Moms and dads should consider the following steps when attempting to discipline a youngster with Aspergers or High Functioning Autism:

1. Clearly post rules and consequences. Kids with Aspergers thrive on clear rules, and therefore posting a list of unacceptable behaviors and their consequences can be immensely helpful. For younger kids who cannot read yet, the rules should be reviewed periodically, and the list could also have visual illustrations to demonstrate the bad behaviors and punishments associated.

2. Come to an agreement on disciplinary techniques. Moms and dads need to be in agreement when applying discipline to any youngster, but especially for kids with Aspergers. If one parent thinks spanking is the appropriate punishment, while the other feels that time-outs will be more effective, this will be confusing for the youngster. Time-outs, loss of privileges such as video games, TV, or weekly allowances, a fair fining structure (as in police ticketing) with a cost associated with each offending behavior or additional chores can all be used effectively.

3. Firmly apply natural consequences. Whenever a bad behavior occurs, natural consequences will result. Sometimes, Moms and dads must apply these consequences when kids are young. For example, if a youngster isn't sharing with another, that other youngster should be asked to leave. This will simulate the most likely scenario that will occur in a playground.

4. Identity concerning behaviors. Moms and dads should list the behaviors that they feel are most deserving of attention. This is an important step because some behaviors may need intervention or therapy in order to be eliminated rather than simple disciplinary tactics. For example, running in circles or humming may be habits that the youngster is using to self-soothe, even though these behaviors might drive Moms and dads crazy. Odd self-soothing behaviors are common in kids on the autism spectrum with sensory processing (integration) issues, and they can be easily replaced with more appropriate ones (such as swinging on a swing or chewing on a healthy snack).

5. Moms and dads need time-outs too. If one parent is home with an Aspergers youngster all day long, that parent may need a break later. Moms and dads should pay attention to one another and give each other time to decompress when necessary. Develop a hand signal or other visual clue that lets the other know when these moments arise.

6. Time-out techniques. Kids with Aspergers tend to enjoy being isolated because it is less stressful for them and they do not have to socialize with others. For these kids, time-outs can actually be a positive experience unless modified slightly. Removing kids from something fun might be a better alternative. For example, if a youngster loves to play with blocks, perhaps the blocks should go in the time-out area. A timer can be used and this will help Moms and dads be more consistent when applying time-outs. Kids prone to destructive tantrums may be placed in a room that contains no breakable items or one that has pillows kids can use to get out their frustrations.

7. Use positive discipline as much as possible. Stickers, tokens and other incentives are effective ways of motivating kids. Also, whenever a problem behavior is identified, early interventions and tactics should be applied. These include replacing unacceptable self-soothing behaviors, relaxation techniques, floor time play therapy, music therapy, auditory therapies which help a youngster focus and listen better, and even improvements in diet.

My Aspergers Child: Preventing Meltdowns and Tantrums

Aspergers Assessment, Diagnosis, and Intervention

Aspergers (AS) is a severe developmental disorder characterized by major difficulties in social interaction, and restricted and usual patterns of interest and behavior. There are many similarities with autism without mental retardation (or “Higher Functioning Autism”), and the issue of whether Aspergers and Higher Functioning Autism are different conditions is not resolved. To some extent, the answer to this question depends on the way clinicians and researcher make use of this diagnostic concept since until recently, there was no “official” definition of Aspergers.

The lack of a consensual definition led to a great deal of confusion, as researchers could not interpret other researcher’s findings. Clinicians felt free to use the label based on their own interpretations or misinterpretations of what Aspergers “really” meant, and moms and dads were often faced with a diagnosis that nobody appeared to understand very well, and worse still, nobody appeared to know what to do about it. School districts were not aware of the conditions, insurance carriers could not reimburse services provided on the basis of this “unofficial” diagnosis and there was no published information providing moms and dads and clinicians alike with guidelines on the meaning and implications of Aspergers, including what should the diagnostic evaluation consist of and what forms of treatment and interventions were warranted.

This situation has changed somewhat since Aspergers was made “official” in DSM-IV (APA, 1994), following a large international field trial involving over a thousand kids and adolescents with autism and related disorders (Volkmer et al., 1994). The field trials revealed some evidence justifying the inclusion of Aspergers as a diagnostic category different from autism, under the overarching class of Pervasive Developmental Disorders. More importantly, it established a consensual definition for the disorder, which should serve as the frame of reference for all those using the diagnosis. However, the problems are far from over. Despite some new research leads, knowledge on Aspergers is still very limited. For example, we don’t really know how common it is, or the male/female ratio, or to what extent there may be genetic links increasing the likelihood of finding similar conditions in family members.

Clearly, the work on Aspergers, in regard to scientific research as well as in regard to service provision, is only beginning. Moms and dads are urged to use a great deal of caution and to adopt a critical approach toward information given to them. Ultimately, the diagnostic label-any label, does not summarize a person, and there is a need to consider the person’s strengths and weaknesses, and to provide individualized intervention that will meet those (adequately assessed and monitored) needs. That notwithstanding, we are left with the question of what is the nature of this puzzling social learning disability, how many people does it affect, and what can we do to help those affected by it. The following guidelines summarize some of the information currently available on those questions.

Background—

Autism is the most widely recognized pervasive developmental disorder (PDD). Other diagnostic concepts with features somewhat similar to autism have been less intensively studied, and their validity, apart from autism, is more controversial. One of these conditions, termed Aspergers was originally described by Hans Asperger (1944, see Frith’s translation, 1991), who provided an account of a number of cases whose clinical features resembled Kanner’s (1943) description of autism (e.g., problems with social interaction and communication, and circumscribed and idiosyncratic patterns of interest). However, Asperger’s description differed from Kanner’s in that speech was less commonly delayed, motor deficits were more common, the onset appeared to be somewhat later, and all the initial cases occurred only in boys. Asperger also suggested that similar problems could be observed in family members, particularly fathers.

This syndrome was essentially unknown in the English literature for many years. An influential review and series of case reports by Lorna Wing (1981) increased interest in the condition, and since then, both the usage of the term in clinical practice and number of case reports and research studies have been steadily increasing.

The commonly described clinical features of the syndrome include:

• Clumsy and ill-coordinated movements and odd posture.
• intense absorption in circumscribed topics such as weather, facts about TV stations, railway tables or maps, which are learned in rote fashion and reflect poor understanding, conveying the impression of eccentricity
• naïve, inappropriate, one-sided social interaction, little ability to form friendships and consequent social isolation
• paucity of empathy
• pedantic and monotonic speech
• poor non-verbal communication

Although Asperger originally reported the condition only in boys, reports of girls with the syndrome have now appeared. Nevertheless, boys are significantly more likely to be affected. Although most kids with the condition function in the normal range of intelligence, some have been reported as mildly retarded. The apparent onset of the condition, or at least its recognition, is probably somewhat later than autism; this may reflect the more preserved language and cognitive abilities. It tends to be highly stable, and the higher intellectual skills observed suggest a better long-term outcome than is typically observed in autism.

Related Diagnostic Concepts—

Several similar diagnostic concepts originating from adult psychiatry, neuropsychology, neurology, and other disciplines share, to a great degree, the phenomenological aspects of ASPERGERS. For example, Wolff and colleagues described a group of people with an abnormal pattern behavior characterized by social isolation, rigidity of thought and habits, and an unusual style of communication. This condition was named schizoid personality disorder in childhood. Unfortunately, a developmental account of his concept was not provided, making it difficult to ascertain the extent to which the people described may have also exhibited autistic-like symptomatology early on in life. More generally, the understanding of ASPERGERS as an unchanging personality trait fails to fully appreciate the developmental aspects of the disorder, which may prove to be of great importance for differential diagnosis.

In neuropsychology, a great deal of research has been devoted to Rourke’s (1989) concept of Nonverbal Learning Disabilities syndrome (NLD). The main contribution of this line of research has been the attempt to delineate the implications for the youngster’s social and emotional development of a unique profile of neuropsychological assets and deficits that appear to have a deleterious impact on the person’s capacity for socialization as well as on the person’s interactive and communicative styles.

The neuropsychological characteristics of people with the NLD profile include deficits in tactile perception, psychomotor coordination, visual-spatial organization, nonverbal problem solving, and appreciation of incongruities and humor. NLD people also exhibit well developed rote verbal capacities and verbal memory skills, difficulty in adapting to novel and complex situations, and over reliance on rote behaviors in such situations, relative deficits in mechanical arithmetic as compared to proficiencies in single-word reading, poor pragmatics and prosody in speech, and significant deficits in social perception, social judgment, and social interaction skills. There are marked deficits in the appreciation of subtle and even fairly obvious nonverbal aspects of communication, that often result in social disdain and rejection. As a result, NLD people show a marked tendency toward social withdrawal and are at risk for development of serious mood disorders.

Many of the clinical features clustered together in NLD have also been described in the neurological literature as a form of Developmental Learning Disability of the Right Hemisphere (Denckla, 1983; Voeller, 1986). Kids presenting with this condition have also been shown to exhibit profound disturbances in interpretation and expression of affect and other basic interpersonal skills. Finally, an additional term researched in the literature, semantic-pragmatic disorder (Bishop, 1989), has also captured aspects of NLD and ASPERGERS.

It is currently unclear whether these concepts describe different entities or, more probably, provide different perspectives on a heterogeneous, yet overlapping, group of people sharing at least some common aspects. An important goal of current research is to seek a convergence between the various discipline-specific accounts in order to make use of different methodologies in the effort to validate the behaviorally defined concept of ASPERGERS. However, in order to enhance comparability of studies, it is of great importance to establish consensual and stringent guidelines for the diagnosis of ASPERGERS, particularly in regard to its similarities with related conditions.

Categorical Definition and Clinical Description:

As defined in DSM-IV (the most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, 1994), the tentative criteria for ASPERGERS follow the same format, and in fact overlap to some degree, the criteria for autism. The required symptomatology is clustered in terms of onset, social and emotional, and “restricted interests” criteria, with the addition of two common but not necessary characteristics involving motor deficits and isolated special skills, respectively.

A final criterion involves the necessary exclusion of other conditions, most importantly autism or a sub-threshold (or “autistic-like”) form of autism (Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified). Interestingly, the DSM-IV definition of ASPERGERS is offered having autism as its point of reference; hence some of the criteria actually involve the absence of abnormalities in some areas of functioning that are affected in autism. The following table summarized the DSM-IV definition of ASPERGERS:

DSM-IV-TR definition of Aspergers (APA, 1994):

A. Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:

1. a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people.
2. failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level
3. lack of social or emotional reciprocity
4. marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction

B. Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:

1. apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals
2. encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus
3. persistent preoccupation with parts or objects
4. stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)

C. The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

D. There is no clinically significant general delay in language (e.g. single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years).

E. There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood.

F. Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia

Onset Criteria—

In DSM-IV, the person’s history must show “a lack of any clinically significant general delay” in language acquisition, cognitive development and adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction). This contrasts with typical developmental accounts of autistic kids who show marked deficits and deviance in these areas prior to the age of 3 years.

Although the onset criterion is in agreement with Asperger’s account, Wing (1981) noted the presence of deficits in the use of language for communication, if not in more specific language skills, in some of her case studies. It is currently uncertain whether the lack of delays in the prescribed areas is a differential factor between ASPERGERS and autism or, alternatively, a simple reflection of the higher developmental level associated with the usage of the term ASPERGERS.

Other common descriptions of the early development of people with ASPERGERS include a certain precociousness in learning to talk (“he talked before he could walk”), a fascination with letters and numbers-in fact, the young youngster may even be able to decode words although with little or no understanding (“hyperplexia”)-and the establishment of attachment patterns to family members but inappropriate approaches to peers and other persons, rather than withdrawal or aloofness as in autism (e.g., the youngster may attempt to initiate contact with other kids by hugging them or screaming at them and then puzzle at their responses). Again, these behaviors are not uncommonly described for higher-functioning autistic kids as well, albeit much more infrequently.

Qualitative Impairments in Reciprocal Social Interaction—

Although the social criteria for ASPERGERS and autism are identical, the former condition usually involves fewer symptoms and has a generally different presentation than does the latter. People with ASPERGERS are often socially isolated but are not unaware of the presence of others, even though their approaches may be inappropriate and peculiar. For example, they may engage the interlocutor, usually an adult, in one-sided conversation characterized by long-winded, pedantic speech, about a favorite and often unusual and narrow topic. Also, although people with ASPERGERS are often socially isolated but are not unaware of the presence of others, even though their approaches may be inappropriate and peculiar. Also, although people with ASPERGERS are often self-described “loners”, they often express a great interest in making friendships and meeting people.

These wishes are invariable thwarted by their awkward approaches and insensitivity to other person’s feelings, intentions, and nonliteral and implied communications (e.g., signs of boredom, haste to leave, and need for privacy). Chronically frustrated by their repeated failures to engage others and make friendships, some of these people develop symptoms of depression that may require treatment, including medication.

In regard to the emotional aspects of social transactions, people with ASPERGERS may react inappropriately to, or fail to interpret the valence of, the context of the affective interaction, often conveying a sense of insensitivity, formality, or disregard to the other person’s emotional expressions. That notwithstanding, they may be able to describe correctly, in a cognitive and often formalistic fashion, other people’s emotions, expected intentions and social conventions, but are unable to act upon this knowledge in an intuitive and spontaneous fashion, thus losing the tempo of the interaction.

Such poor intuition and lack of spontaneous adaptation are accompanied by marked reliance on formalistic rules of behavior and rigid social conventions. This presentation is largely responsible for the impression of social naiveté and behavioral rigidity that is so forcefully conveyed by these people.

As with the majority of the behavioral aspects used to describe ASPERGERS, at least some of these characteristics are also exhibited by people with higher-functioning autism, though, again, probably to a lesser extent. More typically, autistic persons are withdrawn and may seem to be unaware of, and disinterested in, other persons. People with ASPERGERS, on the other hand, are often keen, sometimes painfully so, to relate to others, but lack the skills to successfully engage them.

Qualitative Impairment in Communication—

In contrast to autism, there are no symptoms in this area of functioning in the definition of ASPERGERS. Although significant abnormalities of speech are not typical of ASPERGERS, there are at least three aspects of these individuals’ communication skills, which are of clinical interest. First, though inflection and intonation may not be as rigid and monotonic as in autism, speech may be marked by poor prosody. For example, there may be a constricted range of intonation patterns that is used with little regard to the communicative functioning of the utterance (assertions of fact, humorous remarks, etc.).

Second, speech often is tangential and circumstantial, conveying a sense of looseness of associations and incoherence. Even though in some cases this symptom may be an indicator of a possible thought disorder, it is often the case that the lack of coherence and reciprocity in speech is a result of the one-sided, egocentric conversational style (e.g., unrelenting monologues about the names, codes, and attributes of innumerable TV stations in the country), failure to provide the background for comments and to clearly demarcate changes in topic, and failure to suppress the vocal output accompanying internal thoughts.

The third aspect typifying the communication patterns of people with ASPERGERS concerns the marked verbosity observed, which some authors see as one of the most prominent differential features of the disorder. The youngster or grown-up may talk incessantly, usually about their favorite subject, often in complete disregard to whether the listener might be interested, engaged, or attempting to interject a comment, or change the subject of conversation. Despite such long-winded monologues, the person may never come to a point or conclusion. Attempts by the interlocutor to elaborate on issues of content or logic, or to shift the interchange to related topics, are often unsuccessful.

Despite the possibility that all of these symptoms may be accounted for in terms of significant deficits in pragmatics skills and/or lack of insight into, and awareness of, other people’s expectations, the challenge remains to understand this phenomenon developmentally as strategies of social adaptation.

Restrictive, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities—

Although in the DSM-IV definition the criteria for ASPERGERS and autism are identical, requiring the presence of at least one of the symptoms in the list provided (see table above), it appears that the most commonly observed symptom in this cluster refers to an encompassing preoccupation with restricted patterns of interest. In contrast to autism, where other symptoms in this area may be very pronounced, people with ASPERGERS are not commonly reported to exhibit them with the exception of the all-absorbing preoccupation with an unusual and circumscribed topic, about which vast amounts of factual knowledge are acquired and all too readily demonstrated at the first opportunity in social interaction.

Although the actual topic may change from time to time (e.g., every year or two years), it may dominate the content of social interchange as well as the activities of people with ASPERGERS, often immersing the whole family in the subject for long periods of time. Even though this symptom may not be easily recognized in childhood (because strong interests in dinosaurs or fashionable fictional characters are so ubiquitous among young kids), it may become more salient later on as interests shift to unusual and narrow topics. This behavior is peculiar in the sense that often times extraordinary amounts of factual information are learned about very circumscribed topics (e.g., snakes, names of stars, maps, TV guides, or railway schedules).

Motor Clumsiness—

In addition to the required criteria specified above, an additional symptom is given as an associated feature though not a required criterion for the diagnosis of ASPERGERS, namely delayed motor milestones and presence of “motor clumsiness”. People with ASPERGERS may have a history of delayed acquisition of motor skills such as pedaling a bike, catching a ball, opening jars, climbing on “monkey-bars”, and so on. They are often visibly awkward, exhibiting rigid gait patterns, odd posture, poor manipulative skills, and significant deficits in visual-motor coordination.

Although this presentation contrasts with the pattern of motor development in autistic kids, for whom the area of motor skills is often a relative strength, it is similar in some respects to what is observed in older autistic people. Nevertheless, the commonality in later life may result from different underlying factors, for example, psychomotor deficits in the case of ASPERGERS, and poor body image and sense of self in the case of autism. This highlights the importance of describing this symptom in developmental terms.

Assessment—

ASPERGERS, like other pervasive developmental disorders (PDD’s), involves delays and deviant patterns of behavior in multiple areas of functioning, that often require the input of professionals with different areas of expertise, particularly overall developmental functioning, neuropsychological features, and behavioral status. Hence an experienced interdisciplinary team most effectively conducts the clinical assessment of people with this disorder.

A few principles should be made explicit prior to a discussion of the various areas of assessment. First, given the complexity of the condition, importance of developmental history, and common difficulties in securing adequate services for kids and people with ASPERGERS, it is very important that moms and dads are encouraged to observe and participate in the evaluation. This guideline helps to demystify assessment procedures, avails the moms and dads of shared observations that can then be clarified by the clinician, and fosters parental understanding of the youngster’s condition. All of these can then help the moms and dads evaluate the programs of intervention offered in their community.

Second, evaluation findings should be translated into a single coherent view of the youngster: easily understood, detailed, concrete, and elastic recommendations should be provided. When writing their reports, professionals should strive to express the implications of their findings to the patient’s day-to-day adaptation, learning, and vocational training.

Third, the lack of awareness of many professionals and officials of the disorder, its features, and associated disabilities often necessitates direct and continuous contact on the part of the evaluators with the various professionals securing and implementing the recommended interventions. This is particularly important in the case of ASPERGERS, as most of these people have average levels of Full Scale IQ, and are often thought of as in need for special programming.

Conversely, as Aspergers becomes a more well-known diagnostic label, there is reason to believe that it is becoming a fashionable concept used in an often unwarranted fashion by practitioners who intend to convey only that their client is currently experiencing difficulties in social interaction and in peer relationships. The disorder is meant as a serious and debilitating developmental syndrome impairing the person’s capacity for socialization and not a transient or mild condition. Therefore, moms and dads should be briefed about the present unsatisfactory state of knowledge about ASPERGERS and the common confusions of use and abuse of the disorder currently prevailing in the mental health community. Ample opportunity should be given to clarify misconceptions and establish a consensus about the patient’s abilities and disabilities, which should not be simply assumed under the use of the diagnostic label.

In the majority of cases, a comprehensive assessment will involve the following components: History, psychological assessment, communication and psychiatric assessments, further consultation if needed, parental conferences, and recommendations.

History—

A careful history should be obtained, including information related to pregnancy and neonatal period, early development and characteristics of development, and medical and family history. A review of previous records including previous evaluations should be performed and the information incorporated and results compared in order to obtain a sense of course of development. Additionally, several other specific areas should be directly examined because of their importance in the diagnosis of ASPERGERS.

These include a careful history of onset/recognition of the problems, development of motor skills, language patterns, and areas of special interest (e.g., favorite occupations, unusual skills, and collections). Particular emphasis should be placed on social development, including past and present problems in social interaction, patterns of attachment of family members, development of friendships, self-concept, emotional development, and mood presentation.

The Aspergers Comprehensive Handbook

Working with Schools to Develop an IEP

Question

We are already making preparations for the upcoming school year. Can you give me information on working with the school IEP for my Aspergers son?

Answer

When you have a child with Aspergers (high-functioning autism), IEP negotiations are extremely important. As the parent, you hold a vital position on the IEP team and unfortunately, many moms and dads often feel undermined and in some cases, bullied into accepting the opinions and terms decided by the educational staff. Your input is not only important, but also necessary in the development of a well-rounded IEP for your youngster.

In the days and weeks before your IEP meeting, there are several things you can do to make the experience more pleasant and the outcome more positive. This IEP is imperative to your son’s future.

Here is a list of suggestions for IEP preparation:
  1. Know your son’s strengths and weaknesses so there are no big surprises during the IEP meeting. If you know your son’s abilities and weaknesses, you will be better prepared to request additional services when needed and not offered.
  2. Make notes, ask questions, and request clarification before and during the IEP meeting. When goals are set, be sure you understand the wording and that your thoughts are taken into consideration.
  3. Represent yourself as an equal member of the IEP team. Dress respectably, speak intelligently, and do not feel inferior. Yes, the other members are education professionals, but you are an expert in your son.
  4. Request access to all updated evaluation reports before the IEP meeting in order to prepare for the meeting. You should not have to settle on glancing over the reports or hearing the results second-hand during the meeting.
  5. Request time to review the IEP before signing. There is no reason to rush through this process. Take the IEP home, read over it, and make changes if necessary. Do not sign until you are sure your son has the best IEP possible.
  6. Schedule private evaluations, if you desire. Medical evaluations, including medically referred psychological testing, will present a complete diagnostic picture. Educational evaluations are primarily geared towards diagnostics that affect only the specifics of the education process. These two diagnoses can be different. Without a medical evaluation and official medical diagnosis, your son may miss vital services.

When you have a youngster with Aspergers, the IEP should be treated as the important document and process that it is. The IEP is the backbone to his educational assistance. If you have any questions about appropriate goals or specific questions about the IEP process, there are many great resources available online.

The Aspergers Comprehensive Handbook

2024 Statistics of Autism in Chinese Children

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has emerged as a significant public health concern worldwide, and China is no exception. As of 2024, new rese...